Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Education & ReferenceTrivia · 2 months ago

Would you save your wife or your sister? ?

Your wife is the love of your life and your sister is your best friend. No drama, no problems, they are both great, terrific people. But they are both getting attacked by this large man with thick meaty hands and he's choking both of them with each hand. You can save one but by the time you get to the other one, they have asphyxiated. Which one would you choose first? 

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 12 hours ago

    My wife...

    My sister is a drunken crack head.

  • Anonymous
    4 days ago

    The elite is faking that they took the real vaccine; the real vaccine will cause spiritual and physical damage. When will the official churches start praying for the false prophet? Orthodox Christian three hand signs are different than Buddhist mudras. Ecumenism = 263 heresies; each heresy leads to hell. Orthodoxy = the only true faith; Roman Catholics tried one cup - one spoon ritual and got sick with Bubonic plague; if heresy enters Orthodox monastery then monks/nuns will get sick with flu/tuberculosis (for instance); Orthodox churches who closed for COVID or had disposable cups/spoons or dipped spoon into alcohol are no longer brides of Christ (now they serve Satan and honor Satan's new COVID religion). Don’t go into UFO to be “healed” by evil demons; demons never do good. SSN is written as a barcode/QRcode; then it's put into a chip; chip is put into vaccine; chipped people are influenced (by super computers) to receive grey plastic card World Passport with no name on it (but when they stretch their hands to get it, gov't clerk presses secret button to administer the unforgivable green 666 tattoo by isotope rays). If you reject mark of the beast (by hiding within a 10-15 people group according to saints Gabriel Urgebadze and Seraphim of Sarov), then your direct ancestors go to heaven (according to saint Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov from Ural). First vaccine shuts off your immune system; second vaccine gives you diseases; third vaccine puts your immune system back and it will start fighting the diseases and will cause death. Saint Paisios from Mount Athos said that the devil wants to deceive the rich with freemasonry, poor with communism, and believers with ecumenism. Elpidios Vagianakis said that there will be seven “mark of the beast” vaccines; reject all of them! Documents are from Satan; burn all the documents that you can find. Electronics will be used to track you. Even old broken unplugged 1970 TV set will show the evil flying antichrist using Tesla's ether. Don’t go into UFO to be “healed” by evil demons; demons never do good; always pray the Jesus prayer or to saints who help right away (like saint Vyacheslav Krasheninnikov according to whom if you reject mark of the beast, then your direct ancestors go to heaven); forgive me.

    Source(s): Money will be electronic. Gov't will say someone lost their card or it was stolen; now, they have "solution" aka "mark of the beast system"... because no one will steal your hand/forehead. Remember Book of Revelation says: mark of the beast = permanent hell; forgive me.
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    There is no right answer to the question. Someone who might fall back on the logic that humans are inherently animals might say that once a person has chosen a mate, that relationship supersedes all blood relationships save that of parent and child, i.e.: a person's duty to one's spouse takes precedence over one's duty to a parent, sibling, or any other relation. The only exception to this would be if the choice was between one's spouse and one's child. In the animal kingdom, during lean times, animals might resort to eating their young because while it's possible to have more offspring, it's not as easy to replace a mate. But most humans would see it the opposite way - your child is your top priority. We must defend our children, no ands ifs, or buts about it.  

    Your question implies that a person in a very traumatic situation might somehow be capable of weighing options and arriving at a conclusion using logic. It's not true. Practically anyone in such a situation would have barely a nanosecond to act, and the person's actions would more than likely be based on nothing but sheer instinct. A person who has been in a loving marriage for 15 years who sees his sister twice a year on holidays probably wouldn't grapple with the decision to save his wife. But a person who has been married for 15 months who has no other siblings besides the one sister might - if they two shared a close bond, be more inclined to save his sister and later rationalize that by saying "Well, I only have one sister and I can always find another wife." 

    In either case, a human life is spared and a person dies. Saving your wife and letting your sister die would leave a person wondering for the rest of his life whether or not he made the right decision. But saving your sister and allowing your wife to die would leave one with the same trauma and the same burning question: "Did I make the right choice?" 

    As for me personally, my wife is the mother of my children. I love my sister deeply and in my father's absence it is my duty to protect her. My relationship with my sister was once so close that I felt her husband ought to defer to me, but now my sister and I both have kids of our own, and my personal family unit of which I am the head - the breadwinner, the great defender, takes top priority, over everything and everyone. 

    When I married my wife I promised to always be there for her. My sister is a grown woman and she has a husband to protect her. My duty is to the person to whom I pledged my heart, who has birthed my children. 

    That is the choice that I would make in that short window of time, but I can tell you one thing: The man who took my sister from me would pay dearly for that. He would be begging for a speedy death by asphyxiation long before I was even halfway done with him.  

  • Eva
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    You don't have to choose.  Kicking him in the balls should take care of it since his hands are busy.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    🥴😊

    1. I feel like asking wth kind of scenario is this?

    2. Good question that puts ppl in perspective. Are they for blood first? Or ho3s?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.