Should anonymous contributors in the politics section be allowed to make personal attacks on other contributors, who they have blocked?  ?

I just came across an attack on me from another user;

They posted;

"The anti-white SJW user Jas B says she wants Britain and Europe to be culturally enriched through population replacement?

and mass immigration from African, Asian and Islamic nations to Europe.

If she has fallen in love with Africans, Muslims, Asians, she can always visit those nations to experience their cultures, no?"

I was in fact flattered to think I had annoyed a right winger so much that they had singled me out to attack.  So I wrote a response;

"No I didn't. What I have said is that Britain and Europe have been culturally and economically enriched by immigration throughout it's history.

Having compassion for human beings fleeing wars, persecution, famine and wanting to find a better life for themselves and their children does not make me support mass immigration. It's called having empathy and compassion for those less fortunate than I am.

The suggestion that this makes me anti white, when my children, grandchildren and the vast majority of the people in my life who I love and care about are white is stupid.

However as an old white woman I am greatly proud to be called a Social Justice Warrior, something I have attempted to be all my life.

So thanks."

Only to find that this anonymous contributor has blocked me from responding to his questions.

So should those who cowardly hide behind anonymity be allowed to personally attack people who they block?   

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Rick
    Lv 6
    3 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    nope, not per yahoo, that would be 'chatting between users', and is not allowed.  BUT, as yahoo doesn't seem to care anymore what does go on here, nobody else cares either ............

  • 2 months ago

    You poor baby, boo boo.

  • Anonymous
    3 months ago

    You Jas B, regurgitate the theme from those who were ‘young’ in the 1960s.

    You were conditioned to think that diversity was good, a strength.

    It might have been in small numbers but from 1997 when labour were elected, the floodgates opened and millions of often unemployable immigrants from very alien cultures were imported, creating massive upset to indigenous populations and huge ghettoes that now have engulfed many towns and cities.

    We see the results in the massive immigrant prison population,terrorism, grooming gangs, forced marriage, islamaphobic rants and demands, tribal wars between criminal gangs, slum landlords exploiting illegals, fgm, bigamy, benefit fraud on an industrial scale etc 

    Add to that the demands for quotas on the boards of companies, sports organisations etc, just based on skin tone, and see the disaster it has become.

  • Anonymous
    3 months ago

    No, Jas B. You are in favor of mass immigration and demographic replacement of indigenous British people. You have repeatedly said this for years.

    It is not just about skin color. Will Africans be ok if their continent is demographically replaced by Asians? Will the Chinese and Indians be ok if their Asian countries become predominantly black and Arab? Will the Japanese be ok if their countries are culturally enriched with Middle easterners and Mexicans? No other race will feel ok if their demographics change so fast to the point they become minorities in their own countries. How did Europeans like you become so brainwashed to accept their own erasure in their own countries?

    The vast majority of the British people were ok with immigration levels until 1997. The white British population was 86 percent in 2001. It dropped to 80 percent in 2011. 6 percent drop in just 10 years (2001-2011).

    Immigration to the UK was well controlled for 50 years after world war 2. Tony Blair’s government in 1997 relaxed all the immigration controls and immigration tripled and quadrupled. Net immigration is now 300000 per year. This is extremely high. Nobody is against immigration. But this level of mass immigration is unprecedented in British history. 

     In 2011, the population was 63 million. In 2020, the population is 68 million. 5 million increase in 10 years. Almost all the population growth is coming from immigration or children of BAME citizens. The 2021 census is going to be much worse. 

    You are extremely anti-white. It is possible to be white and denigrate and push anti-white talking points.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    3 months ago

    If they are anonymous, how do you know it is they who blocked you?

  • Edwena
    Lv 7
    3 months ago

    Liberals have no qualms about controlling ideas and speech that they disagree with.  So they block as much as they can. And, of course some of the high tech companies are extreme in that by limiting different opinion. The problem that they will have is that they are limiting high quality opinion of high quality individuals.  

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.