Why is the Postmaster General refusing to provide the analysis that he based his decision like removing mail-sorting machines, etc on?

The truth is because there's no analysis, since DeJoy and Trump are just messing with the mail system to prevent the legitimate election of Democrats via mail.

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Jeff S
    Lv 7
    2 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Because he's a Trump stooge believing in his false Idol!

  • 2 months ago

    There's been a problem for a very long time because e-mail has taken the place over letters. The USPS needs the floor space to process packages. Blame the Democrats for holding up progress in their bid to rig the election.

    Attachment image
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Total bull crap. The Post Office has been removing mailboxes for many years as well as decommissioning machinery as well. There is no proof that the President has anything to do with this. This is just another Liberal Democrat conspiracy hoax to negatively affect the President's inevitable re-election. It's rather humorous that Democrats claim that the USPS is a model of efficiency when they lose Billions every year! They have lost $69 Billion since the fiscal year 2011.

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Another lib throwing a tantrum over something implimented years ago that they just realized was happening.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 2 months ago

    The mail processing side of the Post Office has NEVER been the problem.  It's always been the moving of the mail, by truck, by plane and by the carrier.  LOL

  • 2 months ago

    These decisions were made by the Obama administration PG. I'll wait for Pelosi to call them to testify. 

    Besides, the USPS is failing. Something needs to be done to control costs.

  • 2 months ago

    Where has the analysis been for the last 13 or so years the USPS has been hemorrhaging red ink?  Better yet, where has the action been? 

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    When you realize the Postmaster that Donald J.  Trump pushed for, would make billions if USPS went under.  Chalk another one on the list.

    "If Democrats were confident in winning the election, they wouldn't be demanding mass mail-in balloting (which intrinsically lacks features necessary to election integrity.) "

    Prove this 'intrinsically lacks features necessary to election integrity' because The Trump Administration, can't.

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    If Democrats were confident in winning the election, they wouldn't be demanding mass mail-in balloting (which intrinsically lacks features necessary to election integrity.)

    Grow up.

    ID verification

    Chain-of-custody

    Enforced privacy

    Any six year old can understand why these aren't possible with mass mail-in balloting, and why each is essential to a free and fair election.  Nobody who wants a free and fair election would demand mass mail-in balloting.  Mass mail-in balloting is voter suppression.  In their typical Orwellian fashion, Democrats are accusing normal people of the thing they aren't being permitted to get away with.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.