were/where - which one is correct?

- were would your farm be located?

- where would your farm be located?

8 Answers

  • 2 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    "Where would your farm be located?" is correct. The person saying neither is correct is, um, wrong. For some reason she can't grasp the concept of "future."

    "I'm thinking of buying some land and starting a farm." 

    "Where would your farm be located?"

    Though, if the farm already exists and you are trying to find it, "Where is your farm?" would be correct. 

  • 1 month ago

    where would the farm be located is the correct use of where, where is used when someone is reffering to a place or a location. were is used when you are saying something like 'were you there on Monday?'

  • 2 months ago

    The second sentence is correct.

    "Where" is the appropriate adverb for it. "Were" is the past simple tense form of the verb "to be".

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    where is the only correct one

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    "Where would your farm be located?" is correct.

    If you want to use "were", it should be "was", for: "Was your farm be would be located? ". That is because "farm" is 1st person.

  • 2 months ago


    "Where" refers to place.

    "Were" is the past tense of "be" -  I was, he/she/it was, you were, we were, they were.

    And as a bonus: "we're" is the short form of "we are".

  • RP
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    Where is the correct word. Were has nothing to do with where, other than having four letters in common with it.

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Neither. "Where is your farm located?"

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.