Why did Wisconsin vote for Trump in 2016 but voted Democrat in 2018?
- Anonymous6 months agoFavorite Answer
You're going to get a lot of people explaining Trump's 2016 win by some formulation of "the people wanted X" with X being something that Trump provided. But most of those epxlanations are going to be wrong. They're wrong because they don't understand two key factors about Trump's 2016 victory.
1) Trump barely beat Clinton. He got 47.22% of the vote in Wisconsin and she got 46.45% of the vote. That means he got a statistically insignificant 0.77%. His Wisconsin victory wasn't some sort of big triumph for Trump, but rather a close won thing which he could just as easily have lost. So explanations about what the people of Wisconsin wanted or not don't have a lot of explanatory power.
2) Perhaps much more importantly is that Trump got 1.405 million votes in Wisconsin in 2016. In 2012, Mitt Romney got 1.407 million votes. Mitt Romney lost Wisconsin. So Trump got fewer votes than the losing candidate did four years earlier. Wisconsin didn't vote for Trump, they not-voted for Clinton. Barack Obama got 1.62 million votes in 2012. Four years later, Clinton got 1.38 million votes. There was no swing towards Trump. The people of Wisconsin swung away from the Republicans in 2016. It's just that they swung even more dramatically away from the Democrats.
So what happened in 2016 isn't that Trump persuaded a bunch of Wisconsinites to vote for him. In fact, he did worse than Romney did. But he kept the Republican numbers relatively stable, which Clinton suffered a massive loss of over a quarter million votes. Those people didn't defect to Trump. Some of them voted for third party candidates, but others just stayed home. I don't think we fully know the reasons why. Some have credited the state's voter suppression law, which requires a photo ID to vote. The law, passed in between the two presidential elections, may have kept people from voting. But I think that the bigger issue is apathy about Clinton. The biggest factor was probably the FBI's announcement that they were looking into her emails again. Although this turned out to be nothing (the "new" stuff they were looking at turned out to be copies of stuff they'd already reviewed and they quickly closed the case) it turned off a lot of voters in the closing week of the race. This built on lingering issues with people who didn't like Clinton for various reasons. Some black voters felt she wasn't racially sensitive enough, some left wing voters felt that she wasn't liberal enough. Underlying all of this was a feeling on the left that Trump couldn't possibly win. This may have been especially true in Wisconsin, which no Republican had won since the 80s. I bring up the sense of Clinton's inevitability because I think it's a crucial factor in explaining Trump's win. The people who were skeptical of Clinton felt like it was okay to not actually vote for her because there was no way she could lose. They could have their cake (Trump being defeated) and eat it too (not have to cast a ballot for a candidate like Clinton who they didn't like).
The feeling of inevitability also helps explain the swing back to the Democrats in 2018 when they won the Governorship and the Senate. Democrats were super energized to defeat Trump. Tammy Baldwin, the Democratic Senator up for election last year, got about 70,000 votes more than Trump did. Democrats weren't enthusiastic about Clinton but complacent over her victory in 2016. In 2018 they weren't complacent and turned out in strength for Baldwin (and in somewhat lesser strength for Gubernatorial candidate Tony Evers).
The reality is that Wisconsin is a purple state. It has both a Democratic and a Republican Senator. It's gone traditionally for Democrats but Republican Scott Walker won three races for Governor there. Trump lucked out in 2016, but in 2018 things swung back towards the Democrats.
- Anonymous6 months ago
Wisconsin is a purple state, give or take. Trump barely managed to win the state, and due to his unpopularity the voters switched to a liberal Governor in 2018.
- bluLv 76 months ago
I've spent a lot of time w/ my Wi. neighbors to the north. They are a hearty fun loving people who take their politics relative to their lifestyle. That is to say, they tend to be moderate and intelligent.
Trump won Wi. by a razor thin margin. In fact, he won 3 Midwest states that way which would have reversed the results.
The midterms didn't reflact Russian interference on trump's behalf and everyone had gotten the first dose of trump's extreme politics which don't resonate w/ my neighbors. Plus, it's now obvious how much the trump campaign was BS and lies.
- Dan82828384Lv 56 months ago
Well their different offices. Many people vote split ticket and change political affiliations as parties change
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- JohnLv 46 months ago
Why did teddy Roosevelt shoot a wild cat at what is now wild cat state park?
- Anonymous6 months ago
- Pearl LLv 76 months ago
cause they changed their rninds and wanted to try sornething else
- EntropyLv 76 months ago
Wisconsin is a purple state...it goes both ways (giggity). I suspect they were voting AGAINST Hillary in 2016 as much as FOR Trump. So as long as the Dems nominate someone acceptable in 2020, they'll go against him. Unfortunately, it is NOT looking good right now as the Dem primary is basically a pretty clearly senile man leading the pack, and the rest of the pack engaged in a shameless auction to buy votes by offering to steal from one group of people and give free money to people who vote for them.
- BlueNinjaLoveLv 76 months ago
Either those who didn't like Trump didn't make enough effort to get out and vote in 2016, or the state has since changed its mind about Trump.
- u_bin_calledLv 76 months ago
funny how district-level voting becomes so important when it goes your way.... but when asked to look at them to analyze Hillary's "dominance" in certain states in 2016, it becomes a sudden case of "woah! don't mind the man behind the curtain!!!"