Is the IPCC bending to polluters by sparing politicians the worst details?

'Incredibly, the stark summary is still a relatively conservative assessment of the consequences we might face if global warming does exceed 1.5C.' 'It is written in matter-of-fact language, but it omits some of the biggest risks of climate change, which are described in the full text.' 'For... show more 'Incredibly, the stark summary is still a relatively conservative assessment of the consequences we might face if global warming does exceed 1.5C.'

'It is written in matter-of-fact language, but it omits some of the biggest risks of climate change, which are described in the full text.'

'For instance, the summary indicates that warming of 2C would have very damaging impacts on many parts of the world. But it does not mention the potential for human populations to migrate and be displaced as a result, leading to the possibility of war.'

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/08/world-leaders-climate-change-ipcc-report
6 answers 6