Should President Trump appoint 3 more Conservative Justices to the Supreme Court?

Liberals have long said that if they ever retake the Presidency, they will appoint more S.C. Justices. I assume they won't have a problem with this, should President Trump do this. There is nothing unconstitutional about it.

17 Answers

Relevance
  • 2 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Over the course of his 2 terms, he should appoint the most conservative judges this nation has ever known. At LEAST 3 or 4 more. Roe v Wade should be overturned and the democrat party disbanded for its criminality.

  • He wants to abolish the Supreme Court

  • 2 years ago

    That is what FDR did when the Congress would not go along with his socialist programs. He wanted to point more judges, packing the court with judges who would let him do what he wants. Not even a Democrat congress would let him get away with it. I doubt it would work this time either.

  • 2 years ago

    Roosevelt tried to pack the supreme court but did not succeed

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Reading the answers by Trump supporters/Trolls (they are often one in the same) it is obvious that many on here lack an understanding of the law as it relates to the set up and appointment of judges to the Supreme Court. In addition of course to the facts that ultimately it is the Constitution (you know, that document Conservatives/Trump supporters try to ignore unless it benefits them personally) that provides the basic framework for the US government and it's various branches. I will say one thing, if the founding Fathers were here today and saw what Trump and his supporters are trying to do they would be upset at how far the country has fallen in just under 2 years.

  • Sally
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    Why do you hate our country?

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Ididid

  • 2 years ago

    FDR already tried to pack the Court like that (so other unconstitutional laws and acts wouldn't be struck down). It didn't work.

    Democrats would have to try to replace the Judiciary Act...which would most likely backfire on them.

  • Yavan
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    So you think this is how you are going to keep your death grip on society forever, and ever, and ever…

    Conservative boomers… ugh!

    ''And we will never grow old!''

    Yeah, whatever…

    You get that one institution… and you figured it was the anchor you needed.

    Even after you're dead society will HAVE to abide by your prejudice! Forever and ever and ever! Even the grave won't stop us! NYARK! NYARK! NYARK!!!

    Doesn't work that way.

    Society will go around the institutions.

    Conservatism is a fool's errand no matter what.

    You don't stop history.

    Attachment image
  • 2 years ago

    Do you mean expand the court by 3 more justices, or are you suggesting he like kills liberal judges so he can replace them?

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Yes. Put an end to corrupt and perverse left wing judges.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.