Jeff Engr asked in EnvironmentGlobal Warming · 7 years ago

They were hiding the Benefits?

Friday FUNNY.

I saw this and realized that there were hidden benefits to out of control AGW. Why didn't they tell us this earlier? !?!?!?

Is it a conspiracy to stop of from seeking positive outcomes?

I would have fought hard and done everything possible to accelerate it!!!!

http://wtop.com/884/3623052/District-under-water-N...

10 Answers

Relevance
  • JimZ
    Lv 7
    7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I don't know. With all that filth in Washington, it might make the Exxon Valdez spill pale by comparison. I'm not sure the ocean would recover.

  • 7 years ago

    Don't worry, the politicians have a plan. They will station shock troops from the USDA armed with submachine guns and body armor to keep the advancing water at bay. That is, if they are not busy shaking down the Amish for selling raw milk.

  • 7 years ago

    The negative effects greatly outweigh the benefits. We can't eat dry sand. Humans evolved top our current form in a 200-250 ppm CO2 environment, and the climate that created.

  • C
    Lv 5
    7 years ago

    Definitely a fit dessert for republicans who refuse to accept AGW and hinder progress towards reducing our carbon footprint I guess it's difficult for republicans to focus on the reality of AGW while still struggling with the idea that the earth is round

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 7 years ago

    When the cheaper exploitable frack-stuff is gone, and prices go back up, you can heat your house by burning the Constitution, and celebrate the end of all those Marxist Greenie inalienable rights and protections.

  • 7 years ago

    We really have no say in co2 levels, these are determined by temperature, which in turn is determined by the Sun.

    100% of people who are paid because of the pretend global warming problem will always say that there is a problem. Would you tell your boss that you weren't needed ?

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    Other than the fact that warming causes ice to melt, most of the effects of global warming, good or bad, are speculative. And for someone in Minnesota to drive an SUV or to have accidents in their pants whenever the toilets back up at nuclear power plants sounds like playing God to me. Why doesn't that person just move to Texas where he/she could use renewable power to his/her heart's content and still enjoy hot weather.

    There is good old fashioned skepticism. Why is it OK to question whether global warming is harmful, or that it's caused by carbon dioxide, or that Earth is even warming, and yet, to question the supposed benefits of AGW is taboo?

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    LOL, If we can get rid of that many politicians in one foul swoop it will certainly be worth any negative consequences.

    Got to love when the scare-mongering unintentionally brings you comfort.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    LOL! More room for fish to roam! (Pegminer, Gringo, Climate Realist, Chem Flunky, Gary F, linlyons, and even the Dorkster)

    They can take the hook, line, and sinker to more adventurous places too!

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    Oh no, AGW cultists possibly could not be exaggerating their claims.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.