Why is there such a great schism within the Christian faith, with over 36,000 sects of different viewpoint?
Over 36,000 registered Christian sects in the United States alone. Why the disagreement? Is this just 'Cafeteria Christianity' I.e. selective beliefs, or is there something much deeper and more damaging than that?
I understand that there will be varying degrees of viewpoint, but if the Bible, scriptures, and historical evidence you claim is oh-so clear, then to have so many branches to the faith would seem illogical for one that claims to have evidential supremacy.
I do not mean to be disrespectful to Christians here, I will outline that I am an atheist and do not intend to attack Christianity, I grew up in a practicing Christian household; however, what I find trouble with in Christianity (let alone the problem of other religions with their own numerous sects of belief claiming they are 'correct'), is that there is so much infighting in regards to every aspect of the Christian faith.
Additional Details
The constant inability to read, nay offer a logical answer, from many members of the R&S community astounds me. The point is, for a faith that as a whole represented by lobbies, charity groups, various church networks, and other inter-religious organizations, has claim to being the largest followed faith on the planet and one of being evidently correct (regardless of dispute from outside -- that is not the issue here), there wouldn't be so much infighting if either it was i) Conjoined into the a smaller established network, or ii) Was as clear as it oft claims.
1 year ago
It's not really a sky-high attempt at reasoning though, is it? We apply the same reasoning in every day life. You still misunderstand, and offering a handful of wasteful apathetic opinions as to the differentials between Christian and 'un-' is not really addressing the issue of the great schism, considering your view point is one amongst many unagreeable. The issue is not about 'un-' / Christian, it is about the schism that drives the faith apart. Please, stay on topic, only the asinine mind of a child has such tendencies to wander, and I don't believe you are one.
1 year ago
And again, and I shall word it a little clearer this time, you precede your answer with the question itself. Not an answer, but diatribe, as to why I addressed the wandering gaze of the minds eye in an attempt to lock you back into discussion, one attempt that was obviously misjudged by the 'askee' (form of neologism, of course) given the already limited variability of the answerer. Regardless, thank you very much for your point of view.
1 year ago
By all means do save it; but do not shove your inability to understand or otherwise deduce the meaning of what is, to be frank with you, rather simple English, into the palms of others. It is such reduction fallacy, as well as education (or therein lack of).
1 year ago
Although on the other end of the scale; I do find the abhorrent and frequent use of fallacy from straw man, to guilt by association, to the array of reductions used rather laughable, as well as the total inability to digest basic English (nay us forget mixed in with a good peppering of failure to address the issue, although rather well described by the diversionary fallacy as previously mentioned), in lieu of the ability to comprehend evidential counterstatements that insubordinate your argument on every conceivable level. Ah yes, but they are only the ramblings of a sane person when measured against both infallible evidence offered by the tide on which I stand. It is not I who attempted to reduce this to a bickering (although, as a bat is blind, I suspect you will not quite see it that way, as I am the only one 'bickering' after all -- Suspect of prejudged opinion, 'me thinks').
1 year ago